Was observing the constant retaliatory responses in the middle east, and thought back to the Cuban missile crisis game theory, and wondered if there was a weakness to Tit-for-Tat: "...Tit-for-Tat did, however, have one major drawback: it could become embroiled in conflict with confrontational programs, and those conflicts could go on and on and on.... The missing ingredient, Axelrod learned after a second tournament, was generosity. Occasional generosity, an unexpected act of kindness even in the midst of conflict, can be an effective way to rebuild an atmosphere of trust."
We do need a cultural reset. Most voters are hoping for that, I believe. Except for maybe the angriest MAGAs.
Was observing the constant retaliatory responses in the middle east, and thought back to the Cuban missile crisis game theory, and wondered if there was a weakness to Tit-for-Tat: "...Tit-for-Tat did, however, have one major drawback: it could become embroiled in conflict with confrontational programs, and those conflicts could go on and on and on.... The missing ingredient, Axelrod learned after a second tournament, was generosity. Occasional generosity, an unexpected act of kindness even in the midst of conflict, can be an effective way to rebuild an atmosphere of trust."
https://fordschool.umich.edu/news/2012/changing-game-bob-axelrods-powerful-blueprint-peace