Ten Commandments are not schoolwork

Louisiana's politicians may make a statement with their new law, but they're not doing anything for moral instruction in the schools

Is this the appropriate model for public school instruction? (Photo by Levi Meir Clancy on Unsplash)

---

In the small Midwestern city where I started school, my classmates and I began each day by reciting the Pledge of Allegiance and, then, the Lord’s Prayer. The one little Jewish girl in our class was exempt from the second ritual; the rest of us bowed our heads exactly as we were told, eyes shut and hands folded at our waists, and mumbled a particular Protestant version of the prayer (sins were “trespasses,” not “debts,” though neither word made much sense to us). The Catholic kids had to pick up that extra last sentence — the “kingdom, the power and the glory” part — and the few unchurched youngsters just kind of hummed and moved their lips.

When I was in 4^th grade, the Supreme Court made it clear that the U.S. Constitution didn’t allow taxpayer-funded schools to sponsor praying. Justice Hugo Black’s decision noted that government-sanctioned prayer had been a factor prompting many early English colonists to migrate to America, and that underlying the First Amendment’s promise of religious freedom was the founders’ belief that “a union of government and religion tends to destroy government and to degrade religion.”¹

More than six decades later, in a society far more diverse than what I knew as a child, the politicians leading Louisiana have decided to ignore that notion, seemingly imagining revival of the religious hegemony that Christianity enjoyed in the Leave It To Beaver era. This week the governor signed a law requiring every classroom receiving public funds in Louisiana — from kindergarten through college — to post the Ten Commandments on a poster at least 11 inches by 14 inches, “printed in a large, easily readable font.” Because there are three versions of the so-called Decalogue in the books of Exodus and Deuteronomy, and many translations, the legislature had to specify the words that the “poster or framed document” the law requires would use, so the law adopts the version of the Ten Commandments from the version authorized in 1604 by King James I of England.²

That archaic language specificity is my favorite feature of the law. That’s because in the eighth of the King James version’s 10 “thou shalt nots,” a neighbor’s wife is categorized alongside his manservant, his maidservant and his cattle — all those being possessions, you know, that you’re not supposed to covet. Just imagine the thoughtful conversations that commandment might provoke in a classroom!

Perhaps that notion of spousal ownership might yield some discussion of the historical denigration of women in society. Or maybe the kids perplexed by the old English language could push through that and then explore the legacy of slavery in America, though that topic can get a teacher in trouble in a growing number of Republican-led states, Louisiana unlikely to be an exception.

Probably I’m just fantasizing, though, since 21^st century kids surely aren’t going to learn anything from a poster on a wall. The legislature might just as well have specified handbills and pamphlets, which at least would demonstrate reverence for the Revolutionary Era’s version of the internet.

What’s made clear by a law that requires an 18^th-century communication medium, using 17^th-century English and embracing medieval notions of patriarchal property rights, is that Louisiana’s Ten Commandments law is a political statement, not an educational one. It’s aimed at reminding evangelical Christians that they need to look nowhere but to the MAGA movement for guidance, and in that, it is entirely performative, like so much in politics these days. What it is not is any good for the kids.

Mind you, it’s entirely appropriate for legislators, who broadly prescribe what will be taught in state-funded schools, to be concerned about the moral education of children. You might even consider it more essential now than in my childhood, since the decline of spiritual affiliation in America since the 1960s means that fewer of any religion’s moral lessons are imbued in children.

But Louisiana’s politicians have actually sidestepped that issue. Even if you believe that the inheritors of Louisiana’s great tradition of perfidious political profiteering are the right people to set standards of moral instruction in the schools, you can’t think that they believe this particular law is the right way to teach kids not to kill, steal, lie, commit adultery or want to own that lady next door.

That’s because they know that the law they have passed is flat-out unconstitutional: In 1980, the Supreme Court struck down pretty much the same law — in that case, from Kentucky — and the justices affirmed the broad principle in 2005 in blocking the display of the Ten Commandments at a courthouse.  Yes, that 2005 decision came from a court that included only two of the nine justices who now sit on the Supreme Court. But when the Louisiana law reaches the Supreme Court, as it surely will, it will smack up against the philosophy of the current court’s conservative majority, which is described as “originalist.” Originalists say that the Constitution must be interpreted as it was understood at the time of its adoption. And not only were the Ten Commandments nowhere in the founders’ deliberations, but it’s a fact that the Constitution nowhere mentions either God or the Bible.

James Madison, the so-called Father of the Constitution, considered freedom of conscience to be essential to human existence, and thus saw it as imperative that government not hold any sway over what people could believe. Beyond that philosophy also lay a pragmatic consideration: There was so much religious diversity in the 13 original colonies that the promise of full religious freedom was key, Madison and his colleagues knew, to assuring that the Constitution would be ratified and the union survive. Even a Trump-infused Supreme Court won’t so blithely banish precedent and affirm so blatant an affront to the rule of law as the Louisiana statute presents.

Yet you cannot dismiss a reality that must have guided at least some of the Louisiana lawmakers: America needs a more vigorous sense of morality. Ironically, and sadly, many of us see its absence in the emergence of cruelty and selfishness as the guiding political principle of Donald Trump, though that’s clearly not the worry of the Republican-majority Louisiana legislature and its governor.

Indeed, we might argue that while students certainly would benefit from better instruction in both morality and religion, it ought to reach them not as indoctrination for any particular religion, but in a way so that they might come to appreciate the role religion has played in societies throughout history, for good and for ill, and to grasp what constitutes moral behavior. Perhaps that instruction would reveal that the emergence of Trumpism is in no small part a result of the decline of a moral code throughout much of society. That’s a notion worth exploring, and its reality is a result worth fighting.

If you want to get to the roots of what constitutes moral behavior, or pretty much anything else, of course, you need to look into deep history. Scientists believe that humans began to collaborate with each other about 400,000 years ago, perhaps to forage more productively and to get added protection from predators. That led to a sort of cooperative reasoning — if I’m good to him, he’ll be good to me — which eventually yielded shared social norms. With the rise of agriculture a mere 10,000 years ago, societies began to develop, and with that came diverse religious, ethnic and political influences.³

The humans who filled those societies craved spiritual connection. You may believe that impulse was conceived by God, or you may say that the impulse came first and the notion of a deity followed. In either case, the result has been the emergence of many varied religions over time. Among the world’s 7.8 billion current inhabitants, the largest belief groups now include about 2.4 billion Christians and 1.9 billion Muslims; then come some 1.2 billion people who consider themselves atheists, agnostics, nonreligious and secular people. The religious diversity that follows is astounding in its breadth: Hindu, Buddhism, Sikhism, Judaism, Baha’i and countless more.⁴

Most of those faiths (though not all) teach that theirs is the one true belief for humanity. Yet those religions rarely developed along pathways that can be considered proven foundations. For example: While both Judaism and Christianity teach that the Ten Commandments were handed down to Moses by God during the Israelites’ flight through the desert to freedom from enslavement in Egypt, there is little to support the notion that Moses was a real person, or that the stories of the exodus from Egypt are literally true. History has not been able to establish who might be the personage represented by Pharoah in the Biblical account.⁵

That’s not to deny the value of the foundational moral precepts of Christianity and Judaism. On a personal level, I must affirm that they were essential to forming who I am, and I still cherish them with gratitude and awe. But indoctrination with one set of views ill prepares citizens in so varied a world as today’s for the interactions with others that are necessary to forge a peaceful co-existence. Children need to grow up with a morality that respects, as much as possible, all of the world’s great teachings. Morality is too important to society to let it be based upon a foundation as unproven as one particular set of religious beliefs, especially since religious teachings tend to be perverted by their most rigid and radical advocates.

John Jay Chapman, an American writer born during the Civil War, suggested a course that might be useful even now. He wrote in 1910 that students should become versed in the ideas that have guided moral behavior for centuries, rather than a particular code: “It is familiarity with greatness that we need — an early and first-hand acquaintance with the thinkers of the world, whether their mode of thought was music or marble or canvas or language.” You know, Chapman’s notion sounds a lot like a liberal arts education, which isn’t so much in vogue just now, in no small part because it is under attack by the same radical right-wingers whose number includes those who delivered us Louisiana’s Ten Commandments legislation.

Instead of advancing the sort of preparation for the world that might give young people breadth and understanding, then, we’re watching politicians pilfer a text that billions of people consider sacred and use it as a performance prop. That could strike one as a violation of not just the First Amendment, but also the First Commandment. You know, that part about not taking the Lord’s name in vain. Clearly, the lessons of those verses have been lost on its supposed righteous advocates.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engel_v._Vitale#:~:text=Engel%20v.%20Vitale%2C%20370%20U.S.,violation%20of%20the%20First%20Amendment.

2. https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1364576

3. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-origins-of-human-morality/

4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations

5. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/10/was-moses-real/

---

---

NEWSCLIPS FROM THE UPSTATES

Dispatches from our common ground *

Wherein each week we look around what we call the nation’s Upstates — those places just a bit removed from the center of things — to find illuminating news and intriguing viewpoints, which you might not otherwise see.

This week, we share reporting published here:

• Tallahassee, Fla. (Tallahassee Democrat, tallahassee.com)

• Springfield, Mo. (Springfield News-Leader, news-leader.com)

• West Boylston, Mass. (Worcester Telegram & Gazette, telegram.com)

• Amarillo, Tex. (Amarillo Globe-News, amarillo.com)

NOTE: The complete “Newsclips from the Upstates” section, and The Upstate American Midweek Extra Edition, which is sent to email boxes on some Wednesdays, are available only to paid subscribers. Thanks for your support!

FLORIDA

More bears will soon be shot by Floridians

Fifty years ago, there were only about 300 black bears in Florida. Today the population is estimated to be 4,000. James Call reports in the Tallahassee Democrat that the result has been a huge increase in human-bear interactions — and rising fear, or at least annoyance, on at least one side of that equation. So Gov. Ron DeSantis has signed a new self-defense law that gives Floridians a sort of “stand your ground” defense if they shoot bears. Critics say most encounters could be avoided if people would simply cover their trash, and they worry that people will shoot bears indiscriminately. But the bill’s sponsor said, “No Floridians should have to worry about the consequences of killing a bear when they, or their loved ones, are in danger.”  

MISSOURI

How a zoning dispute can turn brutal

For anyone who has worried about a residential property turning into a commercial site, a fight in the University Heights neighborhood of Springfield is instructive. According to reporting by Marta Mieze in the Springfield News-Leader, a 100-year-old deed restriction is being cited by residents of the neighborhood in a lawsuit aimed at blocking redevelopment of a corner lot for commercial purposes. Now the developer — known as Be Kind & Merciful LLC — has threatened to sue the neighbors, alleging “abuse of process,” in that they were using the courts to influence the rezoning application rather than to get relief from the judicial system. A leader in the neighborhood has offered his own threat to BK&M: Buy his house for $840,000 or the neighbors’ lawsuit will continue; the developer notes that the home was recently appraised for $450,000.

MASSACHUSETTS

Dam removal promises environmental improvements

Environmental awareness and technology together have made it clear that many of the dams built in America over the past 150 years are unnecessary and, in fact, unsound. Here’s an example of progress: Craig S. Simon reports in the Telegram & Gazette that Massachusetts is finally starting to remove a dam built in 1905 on the Quinapoxet River in order to support the Wachusett Reservoir. The Quinapoxet River Dam is a 250-foot long and 18-foot high earthen embankment and stone masonry structure. Its removal will provide upstream fish access to the reservoir, where existing populations of brook trout and landlocked salmon are considered genetically isolated, since the dam restricts vital migratory patterns. The project also will make 35 miles of river accessible to fish and restore riparian habitat. It’s a model for what can be done on other small streams across the country.

TEXAS

Can you really ban a haircut?

Some businesses in Texas have announced plans to ban a haircut that’s popular among men in the state’s Mexican-American community, reports Marley Malenfant of the Austin American-Statesman. The cut is known as The Edgar. Apparently named for a Mexican actor, it’s a short, tapered cut on the sides and back of the head, with longer hair on top styled forward and slightly to one side. It is associated with the Mexican Takuache aesthetic, but there’s growing distrust of people wearing the hairstyle as a result of an April shooting at a festival in San Antonio. Ricky Ortiz, who owns a food truck in San Antonio, said that “the majority of the kids that are getting these haircuts want to be in a culture influenced by gang affiliation and things like that.” But Texas in May became the 21st state to ban race-based discrimination based on hairstyle. Whether that applies to haircutters refusing to give a certain kind of cut remains unclear, Malenfant reported.

---

DOWNLOAD OR LISTEN NOW: MORE FROM THE UPSTATE AMERICAN

IF YOU’RE A READER who wants to hear more of Rex Smith’s views, check www.wamc.org for his weekly on-air commentary aired by Northeast Public Radio. Here’s a link to the latest essay. And if your interest is specific to American media, you can download the podcast of The Media Project, the 30-minute nationally-syndicated discussion that Rex leads each week on current issues in journalism. In the states where Northeast Public Radio is heard, the program airs at 3 p.m. each Friday, and is rebroadcast at 6 p.m. Sunday. You can tune in live, too, at www.wamc.org. It has been called “a half-hour of talk about finding and telling the truth.” It’s often worth your time!

---

THANK YOU for reading The Upstate American, and for joining us in the conversation about *our common ground, this great country. I hope you’ll join us again next week — or send a message with ideas you’d like to see us address.

-REX SMITH